
Must not care about aesthetics
One of the problems with rain jackets is what happens at their lower edge: water drips down over a sensitive area where it soaks your pants at pocket height. It then soaks your underwear. It there’s enough water, capillary action may soak the lower section of your tops too.
Sure, you can wear waterproof bottoms to avoid all that problem sequence just to jump into another: waterproof pants are tedious to put on/take off and they’re stuffy, often leaving you uncomfortably wet.
There’s some middle ground: a long jacket puts the drip line away from sensitive areas. As body dimensions diminish below the crotch, some water will even drip down to the ground. A long jacket is obviously heavier and bulkier to carry than a waist long, regular one but if it’s enough to be comfortable without waterproof bottoms it may make sense even from a weight/bulk standpoint.
The concept is not popular though among modern recreational outdoor waterproofs. That’s why I took it as particularly good news when Sierra Designs announced the Elite Cagoule a couple years back. It took me a while to decide I deserved one but I eventually did.
Features
The idea is to take the cagoule concept of old and adapt it to multi-day backpacking. Weight is an obvious concern. This brings it to the usual compromises:
Simple design
- No frills, no extras, just a hooded, pullover piece that extends below crotch line.
- No breathability nonsense (or so I thought. See below)
- It fits loose and relies on ventilation to avoid internal excess moisture buildup.
- The final weight figure is outstanding: 6 oz
Version shift?
There must have been one. Current models use a PU coating and weight 9 oz. A very bad move, in my opinion. I haven’t found any reference to such upgrade (downgrade?)
I shopped around for an older model. I found one in Campsaver.com or so I thought: declared weight was 6 oz. The item I received weights 9 oz and has a PU coating.
If anyone knows where to get an older model, please let me know. If I’m mistaken about the older version, please let me know too.
Side openings
The Elite Cagoule features partial side openings on the lower section of the sides. This is for ventilation and it’s of particular interest to backpackers because the openings allow the pack’s hipbelt to thread through so the ventilation feature keeps working with the pack on.

Rainwear and impromptu apron
Pullover design
Pullover designs are inherently more difficult to put on/take off than those with a full front opening. As an exchange, they get rid of the potential weak point of an opening where the elements will beat the most. This also helps saving weight as there’s no need to protect the weak point with overlaps and/or waterproof zips. It’s a worthy option. In this case, it pairs well with the long cut, the side openings and the possibility to thread the hipbelt through them.
Pit vents
Pit vents in the Elite Cagoule are rather small and not closeable. I don’t particularly like pit vents as I don’t feel they help much. In this instance, at least they are kept simple: they’ll add a bit of complexity and barely any significant weight.

Pit vent
Chest opening
Chest opening is generous enough for easy put on/take off, as easy as a pullover style can get. Closing is by snap fasteners with a generous enough overlap to avoid leakage.

Fully open
Front pocket
This is the only pocket in the garment. It’s flat against the chest area, just a horizontal strip of fabric with vertical side openings that can’t be closed. The inner walls of the pocket are mesh.

Front pocket
I’m not really sure what it’s meant for. I can think of keeping hands under cover if they’re not in use, maybe holding a folded map that would still need some waterproofing if you really need to keep it dry.
I don’t think I’d use it for anything else, there’d be too much potential for losing it.
Fabric & build
Face fabric is a typical, how denier, densely woven nylon. The PU laminate inside has the also typical rubbery feel that’s not nice against the skin.
The build is good quality. Other than the commented features, it has hook & loop’ed tabs on the sleeve cuffs and no means of fastening the lower edge, which is fine (it’s a cagoule).
The cut is loose but not baggy and it’s true to standard sizing. A M size fits my 5’8” (172 cm) fine.
The fabric wears well, with some limited structural rigidity that I feel is welcome for such a garment design.
Initial review
So far I’ve only used the Elite Cagoule once but it was a good test: hours-long precip with alternating drizzle, heavy rain, hail and, to top it all, exposed sections with strong, blustery wind.
I liked
You feel the protection. The Elite Cagoule has this barrier effect that feels like it puts you on one side and the elements on the other. This is important psychologically. The long drop surely helps with this feeling.
The hood is good, given how simple it is: barely stiff brim, no cord-lock adjusters. With the garment fully snapped, the collar stands up and keeps the hood in a natural, comfortable position. I’ve used the cagoule in heavy, blustery wind and the hood didn’t move out of place. There are this odd, short cords on each side of the hood that would apparently work to cinch it down some but they have no locking system. I pulled on one of them and haven’t been able to thread it back onto its narrow sleeve.

The hood stands on its own
I didn’t like
The side openings closing system is not functional enough. It’s made of hook & loop strips that are just too small. They may get fiddly to align properly, it’s easy to open them accidentally and the unhooked length is enough to allow water in if the weather is violent enough, namely in strong, side winds. This is not a show stopper but I’d have invested a bit of extra weight in longer hook & loop strips. I may actually sew some myself. I’d be an easy hack.

Two hook dots and a snap at the lower edge: not enough
The front (and only) chest pocket is of limited use. I’d add some hook & loop patches to at least be able to partially close it, otherwise it feels too prone to leave stuff fall.
Suggestions for improvement
- More hook & loop length on the side openings.
- Some hook & loop on the front pocket’s sides. Additionally, a bit of a depth drop in the pocket might be welcome to make it really useful. Actually, it might be a good idea to get rid of the pocket and save a few grams. I might actually sew some of the suggested additions myself.
- Go back to where the idea started: build the cagoule from a non-breathable fabric and get the weight back down to 6 oz. This weight reduction is key for a garment that is meant to be carried in the pack regularly.
Summary
This garment would be most interesting if it still was 6 oz. I don’t think the 50% increase in weight of the current model is worth it, even if it really could breathe, of which I’m overly skeptical. At 6 oz it’d be light enough to be carried at all times, even for emergency use in dry climates.
At 9 oz it starts being a bit heavy for emergency use but still a nice option if you like the cagoule concept, which I do. I think it makes a lot of sense for long distance backpacking.
It feels like it would work well in vertical rain, with a good potential to keep a good amount of dripping off your pants entirely.
My plan is to give it a chance at being my default waterproof top for the long distance and see how it goes. If I can find an older model at 6 oz, I’d surely try that one.
RSS – Posts
lila dallas multipass
How do you feel about it nowadays, after a while? Still worth buying?
Viajarapie
My impression hasn’t changed. I commented further on it in the gear review for the Iceland trip (http://viajarapie.info/en/2016/10/gear-iceland-c2c/) where it worked very well but as stated in this latter review Iceland may not be the most representative environment. In the 2017 big trip, unfortunately, I couldn’t use it, even though I meant to, after my luggage was lost on transit, only recovered after the trip.
I like the cagoule concept, I think setting the drip line mid-thigh makes a lot of sense for backpacking and I’m happy to pay the weight penalty. This particular model is well designed. If anything, I’d spare the breathable membrane and use a non-breathable laminate or impregnation, it’d be more durable and probably lighter.
lila dallas multipass
Thanks! Interestingly there are a few versions on the current SD page so its hard to know which you’re buying or which is better. Have you come across another Cagoule you like that you’d also use if necessary?
Viajarapie
It seems they have a new model and the old one is on the sales section. They’ve changed the front pocket design which seems to be zippered and top access in the new model instead of open and access both sides in the old one. The new model also is stated as longer, 49.5″ vs 37.5″. It certainly looks longer in the pics but not as much as 12″. It’s not clear from the pics if the new model is open on the sides as it is the old one for the lower half of the garment. It’s not mentioned on the specs either. There is a cord lock visible on the lower hem which might suggest there’s no side openings.
Mine is definitely the old model: https://sierradesigns.com/mens-elite-cagoule/ even though it’s stated as 3 Layer when mine is 2 Layer. This might be an error in the SD website, if you look at the inner in the pics it looks like the membrane is exposed. It’s only visible on the hood area though. The stated weight is roughly the same as in mine (9 oz as per the website vs 8 oz for mine, I just weighted it again to verify)
Provided both old and new models are 2 Layer, it’s difficult to say which one would be better. I’d like to know the weight of the new model before anything else, then I might like to try it. It will offer more coverage being longer, maybe eliminating completely the need for rain pants, but it might be a bit cumbersome, as it happens with ponchos, making it not good for rough terrain but still OK for good trails.
If you eventually get one, do let me know which one and how you find it.
Viajarapie
Regarding your 2nd question, not really. I have a similar item that’s cycling specific (longer on the front) that might do for hiking but it’s a cheap make, so-so waterproofness and an awful wet feel when it gets wet. It’s a Decathlon item, a brand you might know if you’re in Europe, big store of the outdoor things for the masses. Also from Decathlon I got a hiking specific item that’s a sort of mix between poncho and cagoule, it’s a poncho with arms or a cagoule with some extra room on the upper back for a mid-size pack underneath, I guess you get the picture. Not bad by design but the same fabric as the cycling item above, I don’t think I’d take it backpacking any long distance on a committed route.
I haven’t been actively searching for one though. Cagoules are not a common find, unfortunately.
lila dallas multipass
This is interesting. I am in the US and I would love to find something that works for cycling that also covers some of the legs. I commute daily about 15mi each way and while jackets are easy to come by, rain pants SUCK and rain kilts flap too much and ponchos (even cycling ponchos) are terrible in wind. I thought the Elite Cagoule (not the newer, longer, Cagoule) might be good for cycling since it covers the front but isn’t too long or too flappy. Enjoying this conversation, thank you for the insight!
Viajarapie
I haven’t used my Elite Cagoule on the bike but I’m positive it’d be too short. It’d run above my knees while pedaling and I’d get wet up to about mid-thigh on the front side of the legs. The newer model might stay put below the knees but it might not have enough room for pedaling if it has no side openings.
Cycling stores should have something like what you’re looking for. If it’s in a long pullover fashion, it might work for hiking too. This one here is an updated model of the Decathlon one I mentioned before that I have:
https://www.decathlon.es/poncho-impermeable-ciclismo-ciudad-btwin-700-amarillo-negro-id_8354731.html
It can be worn as a long pullover, then it will probably cover the legs below the knees without riding up and without becoming a kite in the wind. You should be able to find something like this locally.
We went over the limit of indentation for comments 🙂 so use the last comment with a “Reply” link for any further comment you might want to add.
lila dallas multipass
Replying here – thanks for all the help. Interestingly in the US its hard to find things like what Decathlon has, because people here are married to “coolness” and the like. I’ll keep looking and try to find the “perfect” raingear. Thanks again and I’ll keep following your blog 🙂
Viajarapie
If nothing else is available, a regular poncho would work too. If it’s not windy, you can let it hang loose behind your back and set it over the handlebar. This configuration offers good protection and ventilation but you must take extra care to hold the handlebars at all times to avoid accidents. If windy, the poncho still works if you sit on top of it on the back and let it hang over your legs on the front, the main problem then being that you get your forearms wet.
In any case, you still get your lower legs wet from splash so it’s a good idea to use some kind of lower leg cover. Hiking gaiters work well for this.
Good luck and thanks for the following!